<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Just In&#8230;..The 11 Manliest Anchormen of All Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artofmanliness.com/2009/03/18/11-manliest-anchormen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artofmanliness.com/2009/03/18/11-manliest-anchormen/</link>
	<description>Men&#039;s Interests and Lifestyle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:01:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny the Freemason</title>
		<link>http://artofmanliness.com/2009/03/18/11-manliest-anchormen/comment-page-1/#comment-64313</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny the Freemason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=2162#comment-64313</guid>
		<description>I agree with the entirety of the list with the exception of Steven Colbert. While unmanly he may be we must keep in mind, unlike the others on the unmanly schmuck list portion, Colbert is playing a character for the sake of humor. The others are merely caricatures of their respective puppeteers..... and just flippant dolts in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the entirety of the list with the exception of Steven Colbert. While unmanly he may be we must keep in mind, unlike the others on the unmanly schmuck list portion, Colbert is playing a character for the sake of humor. The others are merely caricatures of their respective puppeteers&#8230;.. and just flippant dolts in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcel bradet</title>
		<link>http://artofmanliness.com/2009/03/18/11-manliest-anchormen/comment-page-1/#comment-57917</link>
		<dc:creator>marcel bradet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=2162#comment-57917</guid>
		<description>THE PEOPLE ASK FOR BULLSHIT YOU GIVE THEM BULLSHIT, THE POLITICS IS IN USA THE WORST OF ALL, WITH THE LOBBYING AND AN AMERICAN IS SOMEONE WHO IS NOT A PART OF SOCIETY IS THE SOCIETY HIMSELF THE REST OFTHE CITIZENS CAN&#039;T SURVIVE, IS NOT HIS FAMILY, THE SELFISH AMERICAN IS THERE, AND DO NOT TALK ABOUT BLACK, SPANIST AND OTHER RACIE A WASP IS BETTER THAN ANOTHER RACE OF THE WORLD. IS READY TO GO THE PREACHER WITH ALL HIS FAMILY THE HYMS AND READ THE BIBLE OR ELSE BUT DO NOT ASK TO PRACTICE WHAT HE READ, HE IS EXACTLY A MEN OR FEMALE OF THE LOWER EXTRACTION, DO NOT ASK IF THE REST OR PEOPLE OF THE WORLD LOVE THE WAY THEY USE THEIR POVER NO ONE LIKE THEM AND MANY PRAY FOR THAT THEY LOUSE IN IRAQ AND WITH THE TALIBANS, THEY ARE 50% ASSHOLE WHEN A COUNTRY HAVE VOTE FOR BUSH WE KNOW THEIR INTELLECT BACKGROUNG, IS THIS MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY AND THE REST NOT NECESSARY AND THEY THINK THAT THEY ARE THE NATION CHOOSE GOD IS NOT AN AMERICAN, AND IF GOD WAS, THE NEXT THING HE WILL DO IT IS A WAR, SO PLEASE STAY IN YOUR COUNTRY WE DO NOT WANT YOU, STAY IN YOUR TOWNS AND MAKE WAR WITH THE OTHER STATE, AND TO SHOW THE WORST OF IT, A BLACK PRESIDENT IS FOR YOU A SPOT ON YOUR WHITE SUPREMACY, WHATCH YOUR BACK AND PAY FOR IT, YOU ARE NOT LOVE LIKE THE ROMANS WHERE NOT ALSO AND THE FALL OF THE ROMAN CAME AND YOU ARE PRESENTLY IN THE RIGHT PATH, BECAUSE, YOUR COUNTRY IS NOT YOURS, YOUR COUNTRY IS SAOUD, CHINESSE, AND OTHER COUNTRY WHO BACK YOU, IN THE NEXT CENTURY, THE 22TH, CHANGE WILL OCCUR SO FAST THAT YOU SEE SOME INDIVIDUALS THAT WHO OWN YOUR COUNTRY IN WALL STREET. I PREFER TO BE A CITIZEN OF THE WORLD THAT AN AMERICAN WITH THIS NARROW MINDED SPIRIT AND ATTITUDE. A PAIN IN THE ASS FOR THE OTHER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE PEOPLE ASK FOR BULLSHIT YOU GIVE THEM BULLSHIT, THE POLITICS IS IN USA THE WORST OF ALL, WITH THE LOBBYING AND AN AMERICAN IS SOMEONE WHO IS NOT A PART OF SOCIETY IS THE SOCIETY HIMSELF THE REST OFTHE CITIZENS CAN&#8217;T SURVIVE, IS NOT HIS FAMILY, THE SELFISH AMERICAN IS THERE, AND DO NOT TALK ABOUT BLACK, SPANIST AND OTHER RACIE A WASP IS BETTER THAN ANOTHER RACE OF THE WORLD. IS READY TO GO THE PREACHER WITH ALL HIS FAMILY THE HYMS AND READ THE BIBLE OR ELSE BUT DO NOT ASK TO PRACTICE WHAT HE READ, HE IS EXACTLY A MEN OR FEMALE OF THE LOWER EXTRACTION, DO NOT ASK IF THE REST OR PEOPLE OF THE WORLD LOVE THE WAY THEY USE THEIR POVER NO ONE LIKE THEM AND MANY PRAY FOR THAT THEY LOUSE IN IRAQ AND WITH THE TALIBANS, THEY ARE 50% ASSHOLE WHEN A COUNTRY HAVE VOTE FOR BUSH WE KNOW THEIR INTELLECT BACKGROUNG, IS THIS MONEY MONEY MONEY MONEY AND THE REST NOT NECESSARY AND THEY THINK THAT THEY ARE THE NATION CHOOSE GOD IS NOT AN AMERICAN, AND IF GOD WAS, THE NEXT THING HE WILL DO IT IS A WAR, SO PLEASE STAY IN YOUR COUNTRY WE DO NOT WANT YOU, STAY IN YOUR TOWNS AND MAKE WAR WITH THE OTHER STATE, AND TO SHOW THE WORST OF IT, A BLACK PRESIDENT IS FOR YOU A SPOT ON YOUR WHITE SUPREMACY, WHATCH YOUR BACK AND PAY FOR IT, YOU ARE NOT LOVE LIKE THE ROMANS WHERE NOT ALSO AND THE FALL OF THE ROMAN CAME AND YOU ARE PRESENTLY IN THE RIGHT PATH, BECAUSE, YOUR COUNTRY IS NOT YOURS, YOUR COUNTRY IS SAOUD, CHINESSE, AND OTHER COUNTRY WHO BACK YOU, IN THE NEXT CENTURY, THE 22TH, CHANGE WILL OCCUR SO FAST THAT YOU SEE SOME INDIVIDUALS THAT WHO OWN YOUR COUNTRY IN WALL STREET. I PREFER TO BE A CITIZEN OF THE WORLD THAT AN AMERICAN WITH THIS NARROW MINDED SPIRIT AND ATTITUDE. A PAIN IN THE ASS FOR THE OTHER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://artofmanliness.com/2009/03/18/11-manliest-anchormen/comment-page-1/#comment-33242</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=2162#comment-33242</guid>
		<description>you want manly look no further than Dan Rather, he composed himself well while we were taking fire, he gets my bid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you want manly look no further than Dan Rather, he composed himself well while we were taking fire, he gets my bid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christatos</title>
		<link>http://artofmanliness.com/2009/03/18/11-manliest-anchormen/comment-page-1/#comment-29222</link>
		<dc:creator>Christatos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 02:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=2162#comment-29222</guid>
		<description>I met Mr. Murrow when I was a small boy in 1964 only a year before he died. It was an ugly sight, and only a year after he had an operation to have one lung removed. Weak and dying, I was only able to see him over the course of a single day because my father knew him from his days broadcasting during the Blitz, as my father had worked in British Intelligence or the British Army or something like that during the Blitz, and had become a smoking acquaintance of Murrow&#039;s and was determined to see him before he died. Even then, when I was a boy, and as the man was dying, I knew he was a great man. The day he died was the only time in my entire life that I saw my father cry. All my childhood I had been raised with stories of Edward R Murrow, the great American, and the rest of my childhood those stories continued, and the impressions has remained. Edward R. Murrow was the model upon which other journalists should base their careers.

As for bias in this article, I think you are all being a little narrow minded. Refer back to the Murrow Boys and their contemporaries. What made these men great was not any pretensions to presenting the facts in a balanced sense, but telling the truth, speaking their opinions, and not hiding the fact. Each of these men is great for presenting the facts, telling you what they thing, and not hiding the fact that they are telling you their opinion. A poor newsman tells you he is fair. That is a lie. A great newsman tells you the truth. Each of these men did or does that. Where their opinion comes from, right or left is irrelevant. They tell you. You know what to filter. With the liars, you can&#039;t be sure which direction to turn. I ask, before you attack, that you return to Murrow, and consider journalism and the historical roots of the craft and it&#039;s original purpose on television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I met Mr. Murrow when I was a small boy in 1964 only a year before he died. It was an ugly sight, and only a year after he had an operation to have one lung removed. Weak and dying, I was only able to see him over the course of a single day because my father knew him from his days broadcasting during the Blitz, as my father had worked in British Intelligence or the British Army or something like that during the Blitz, and had become a smoking acquaintance of Murrow&#8217;s and was determined to see him before he died. Even then, when I was a boy, and as the man was dying, I knew he was a great man. The day he died was the only time in my entire life that I saw my father cry. All my childhood I had been raised with stories of Edward R Murrow, the great American, and the rest of my childhood those stories continued, and the impressions has remained. Edward R. Murrow was the model upon which other journalists should base their careers.</p>
<p>As for bias in this article, I think you are all being a little narrow minded. Refer back to the Murrow Boys and their contemporaries. What made these men great was not any pretensions to presenting the facts in a balanced sense, but telling the truth, speaking their opinions, and not hiding the fact. Each of these men is great for presenting the facts, telling you what they thing, and not hiding the fact that they are telling you their opinion. A poor newsman tells you he is fair. That is a lie. A great newsman tells you the truth. Each of these men did or does that. Where their opinion comes from, right or left is irrelevant. They tell you. You know what to filter. With the liars, you can&#8217;t be sure which direction to turn. I ask, before you attack, that you return to Murrow, and consider journalism and the historical roots of the craft and it&#8217;s original purpose on television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus Ver Magnuson</title>
		<link>http://artofmanliness.com/2009/03/18/11-manliest-anchormen/comment-page-1/#comment-26328</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Ver Magnuson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 14:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofmanliness.com/?p=2162#comment-26328</guid>
		<description>Pretty lame. If Anderson Cooper is a model of manliness I have some serious thinking to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty lame. If Anderson Cooper is a model of manliness I have some serious thinking to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

